This is the second part of a two part series.  Click here to read Premises Liability, Part 1.

HE SAYS:

The owner of a business, in addition to maintaining the property in a safe condition, is required to take reasonable care to make sure that his patrons are not negligently or intentionally harmed by his employees or other patrons.   This duty may arise when the owner knows or should have known that an employee or patron poses a danger based on present or past conduct.

There may be no liability, as a matter of law, if the injury is caused by a defect so slight that a prudent person would not reasonably anticipate that it presented a danger.   In contrast, there may also be no liability when a defect is so obvious that it could readily have been observed and avoided.

Liability may be mitigated or even eliminated by certain legal doctrines.   Comparative or contributory negligence doctrines would require the property owner’s liability to be reduced or eliminated by the injured party’s own misconduct or lack of reasonable care for his own safety.

The Assumption of the Risk doctrine states that an injured person cannot recover for risks that he assumed, provided the risks are not unusual or obscure or unduly enhanced by the owner of the premises.   For example, a patron of a sports facility who engages in a sporting activity assumes all of the risks inherent in that activity as well as any obvious conditions of the premises where the activity takes place.   This doctrine could apply to ski resorts, baseball parks, golf courses and any number of other sports or recreational facilities.

In short, be careful and be insured.

WHAT DO YOU SAY?

HE SAYS:

In general, a property owner who opens his property to the public for purposes of gain impliedly warrants the premises to be reasonably safe for the purpose intended and is under a legal duty to exercise due care to maintain the premises in a safe condition.   The duty to maintain the premises in a safe condition includes a duty to make reasonable inspections for defects and repair such defects in a timely manner.

Generally, property owners are held to a single standard or duty of reasonable care based on the foreseeability of someone on their property being placed in danger.   The status of the injured party as a trespasser, licensee or invitee is no longer the determining factor; but, is one factor in determining the foreseeability of that person’s presence on the property and the level of care reasonably required under the circumstances.

In order for a property owner to be liable for a defective condition on the premises, he must have actual notice of the condition and time to correct it or he must be deemed to have constructive notice which occurs when the condition has existed for a sufficient period of time such that the property owner reasonably should have known of and corrected the condition.

A property owner may also have a special duty to keep the adjoining sidewalk in a safe condition when the adjoining sidewalk is used for a special purpose for the benefit of the property owner or he has created a dangerous condition on the adjoining sidewalk.   Examples of this would be when a business uses the adjoining sidewalk to display its goods or as an outdoor eating area such as a sidewalk cafe.

See Part 2 for additional liability issues and certain limits on liability.

WHAT DO YOU SAY?